He once said: "Politics is for the moment, but an equation is for eternity. They should last as long as the universe. The world has changed far more in the last hundred years than in any previous century. The reason has not been new political or economic doctrines but the vast developments in technolo- gy made possible by advances in basic science. W h o better symbolizes those advances than Albert Einstein?
How this can be reconciled with quantum theory. Or is it a railroad track? Maybe it has loops and branches, so you can keep going forward and yet return to an earlier station on the line Fig. The nineteenth-century author Charles Lamb wrote: "Nothing puzzles me like time and space. And yet nothing troubles me less than time and space, because I never think of them.
Any sound scientific theory, whether of time or of any other concept, should in my opinion be based on the most workable phi- losophy of science: the positivist approach put forward by Karl Popper and others. According to this way of thinking, a scientific theory is a mathematical model that describes and codifies the observations we make. A good theory will describe a large range of phenomena on the basis of a few simple postulates and will make definite predictions that can be tested.
If the predictions agree with the observations, the theory survives that test, though it can never be proved to be correct. On the other hand, if the observations dis- agree with the predictions, one has to discard or modify the theo- ry. At least, that is what is supposed to happen. In practice, people often question the accuracy of the observations and the reliability and moral character of those making the observations. If one takes the positivist position, as I do, one cannot say what time actually is.
All one can do is describe what has been found to be a very good mathematical model for time and say what predictions it makes. Isaac Newton gave us the first mathematical model for time and space in his Principia Mathematica, published in Newton occupied the Lucasian chair at Cambridge that I now hold, though it wasn't electrically operated in his time.
In Newton's model, time and space were a background in which events took place but which weren't affected by them. Time was separate from space and was considered to be a single line, or railroad track, that was infinite in both directions Fig.
Time itself was considered eternal, in the sense that it had existed, and would exist, forever. By contrast, most people thought the physical universe had been created more or less in its present state only a few thousand years ago.
This worried philosophers such as the German thinker Immanuel Kant. If the Isaac Newton published his universe had indeed been created, why had there been an infinite mathematical model of time and space over 3 0 0 years ago. On the other hand, if the universe had existed forever, why hadn't everything that was going to happen already happened, meaning that history was over? In particular, why hadn't the universe reached thermal equilibrium, with every- thing at the same temperature?
T h e large ball in the center represents But it was a contradiction only within the context of the Newtonian a massive body such as a star mathematical model, in which time was an infinite line, independent Its weight curves the sheet near it of what was happening in the universe.
However, as we saw in T h e ball bearings rolling on the sheet are deflected by this curvature and go Chapter 1, in 1 9 1 5 a completely new mathematical model was put around the large ball, in the same way forward by Einstein: the general theory of relativity. In the years that planets in the gravitational field of since Einstein's paper, we have added a few ribbons and bows, but a star can orbit it. This and the following chapters will describe how our ideas have developed in the years since Einstein's revolutionary paper.
It has been a success story of the work of a large number of people, and I'm proud to have made a small contribution. The theory incorporates the effect of gravity by saying that the distribution of matter and energy in the universe warps and distorts spacetime, so that it is not flat. Objects in this spacetime try to move in straight lines, but because spacetime is curved, their paths appear bent. They move as if affected by a gravitational field. As a rough analogy, not to be taken too literally, imagine a sheet of rubber.
One can place a large ball on the sheet to represent the Sun. The weight of the ball will depress the sheet and cause it to be curved near the Sun. If one now rolls little ball bearings on the sheet, they won't roll straight across to the other side but instead will go around the heavy weight, like planets orbiting the Sun Fig.
The analogy is incomplete because in it only a two-dimension- al section of space the surface of the rubber sheet is curved, and time is left undisturbed, as it is in Newtonian theory. However, in the theory of relativity, which agrees with a large number of experi- ments, time and space are inextricably tangled up. One cannot curve space without involving time as well. Thus time has a shape.
By curv- ing space and time, general relativity changes them from being a passive background against which events take place to being active, dynamic participants in what happens. In Newtonian theory, where time existed independently of anything else, one could ask: What did God do before He created the universe?
As Saint Augustine said, one should not joke about this, as did a man who said, "He was preparing Hell for those who pry too deep. According to Saint Augustine, before God made heaven and earth, He did not make anything at all. In fact, this is very close to modern ideas. In general relativity, on the other hand, time and space do not exist independently of the universe or of each other.
They are defined by measurements within the universe, such as the number of vibra- tions of a quartz crystal in a clock or the length of a ruler. It is quite conceivable that time defined in this way, within the universe, should have a minimum or maximum value—in other words, a beginning or an end. It would make no sense to ask what happened before the beginning or after the end, because such times would not be defined.
The general prejudice among theoretical physicists, including Einstein, held that time should be Galaxies as they appeared recently infinite in both directions. Otherwise, there were awkward ques- Galaxies as they appeared 5 tions about the creation of the universe, which seemed to be out- billion years ago side the realm of science.
Solutions of the Einstein equations were known in which time had a beginning or end, but these were all The background radiation very special, with a large amount of symmetry. It was thought that in a real body, collapsing under its own gravity pressure or sideways velocities would prevent all the matter falling together to the same point, where the density would be infinite.
Similarly, if one traced the expansion of the universe back in time, one would find that the matter of the universe didn't all emerge from a point of infinite den- sity. Such a point of infinite density was called a singularity and would be a beginning or an end of time.
In 1 9 6 3 , two Russian scientists, Evgenii Lifshitz and Isaac Khalatnikov, claimed to have proved that solutions of the Einstein equations with a singularity all had a special arrangement of matter and velocities. The chances that the solution representing the uni- verse would have this special arrangement were practically zero. Almost all solutions that could represent the universe would avoid having a singularity of infinite density: Before the era during which the universe has been expanding, there must have been a previous contracting phase during which matter fell together but missed col- liding with itself, moving apart again in the present expanding phase.
If this were the case, time would continue on forever, from the infinite past to the infinite future. Not everyone was convinced by the arguments of Lifshitz and FIG. Instead, Roger Penrose and I adopted a different When we look at distant galaxies, we approach, based not on a detailed study of solutions but on the are looking at the universe at an earli- global structure of spacetime.
In general relativity, spacetime is er time because light travels at a finite curved not only by massive objects in it but also by the energy in speed.
If we represent time by the it. Energy is always positive, so it gives spacetime a curvature that vertical direction and represent two of the three space directions horizon- bends the paths of light rays toward each other. Because the universe has been tensity with frequency—of the cosmic expanding and everything used to be much closer together, as we microwave background radiation is characteristic of that from a hot body.
We observe a faint background of microwave radia- equilibrium, matter must have scat- tion that propagates to us along our past light cone from a much tered it many times. T h i s indicates that earlier time, when the universe was much denser and hotter than it there must have been sufficient matter in our past light cone to cause it to is now.
By tuning receivers to different frequencies of microwaves, bend in. We find a spectrum that is charac- FIG. This microwave radiation is not much good always warps spacetime so that light for defrosting frozen pizza, but the fact that the spectrum agrees so rays bend toward each other.
Thus we can conclude that our past light cone must pass through a certain amount of matter as one follows it back. This amount of matter is enough to curve spacetime, so the light rays in our past light cone are bent back toward each other Fig. Our past is pear-shaped Fig. As one follows our past light cone back still further, the posi- tive energy density of matter causes the light rays to bend toward each other more strongly. The cross section of the light cone will shrink to zero size in a finite time.
This means that all the matter inside our past light cone is trapped in a region whose boundary shrinks to zero. It is therefore not very surprising that Penrose and I could prove that in the mathematical model of general relativity, time must have a beginning in what is called the big bang.
Similar arguments show that time would have an end, when stars or galax- ies collapse under their own gravity to form black holes. We had sidestepped Kant's antimony of pure reason by dropping his implicit assumption that time had a meaning independent of the universe.
I don't think the other prize essays that year have shown much enduring value. There were various reactions to our work. It upset many physi- cists, but it delighted those religious leaders who believed in an act of creation, for here was scientific proof.
Meanwhile, Lifshitz and Khalatnikov were in an awkward position. They couldn't argue with the mathematical theorems that we had proved, but under the Soviet system they couldn't admit they had been wrong and Western science had been right. However, they saved the situation by finding a more general family of solutions with a singularity, which weren't special in the way their previous solutions had been.
This enabled them to claim singularities, and the beginning or end of time, as a Soviet discovery. The whole universe we observe is contained within a region whose boundary shrinks to zero at the big bang.
T h i s would be a singularity, a place where the density of matter would be infinite and classical general relativity would break down.
T h e longer the wavelength used to The shorter the wavelength used to observe a particle, the greater the observe a particle, the greater the uncertainty of its position. They therefore pointed out that the math- ematical model might not be expected to be a good description of spacetime near a singularity. The reason is that general relativity, which describes the gravitational force, is a classical theory, as noted in Chapter 1, and does not incorporate the uncertainty of quantum theory that governs all other forces we know.
This incon- sistency does not matter in most of the universe most of the time, because the scale on which spacetime is curved is very large and the scale on which quantum effects are important is very small.
But near a singularity, the two scales would be comparable, and quantum gravitational effects would be important. So what the singularity theorems of Penrose and myself really established is that our classi- cal region of spacetime is bounded to the past, and possibly to the future, by regions in which quantum gravity is important.
To under- stand the origin and fate of the universe, we need a quantum theo- ry of gravity, and this will be the subject of most of this book. Quantum theories of systems such as atoms, with a finite number of particles, were formulated in the s, by Heisenberg, Schrodinger, and Dirac. Dirac was another previous holder of my chair in Cambridge, but it still wasn't motorized. However, people encountered difficulties when they tried to extend quantum ideas to the Maxwell field, which describes electricity, magnetism, and light.
One can think o f the Maxwell field as being made up o f waves FIG. In a wave, the field will swing fro m o ne value to ano ther Electromagnetic radiation travels like a pendulum Fig. That wo uld have bo th a definite to the wave's direction of motion. The radiation c an be made up of fields of position and a definite velo city, zero. This wo uld be a vio latio n o f different wavelengths.
According to the Heisenberg principle it is impossible for a pendulum to These mean that the pendulum won't necessarily be pointing absolutely point straight down, with straight down but will also have a probability of being found at a zero velocity. Instead quantum theory small angle to the vertical Fig. Similarly, even in the vacuum predicts that, even in its lowest energy state, the pendulum must have a min- or lowest energy state, the waves in the Maxwell field won't be imum amount of fluctuations.
The higher the frequency T h i s means that the pendulum's posi- the number of swings per minute of the pendulum or wave, the tion will be given by a probability distri- higher the energy of the ground state. In its ground state, the most likely position is pointing straight down, Calculations of the ground state fluctuations in the Maxwell but it has also a probability of being and electron fields made the apparent mass and charge of the elec- found at a small angle to the vertical.
Nevertheless, the ground state fluctuations still caused small effects that could be measured and that agreed well with experiment. Similar subtraction schemes for removing infinities worked for the Yang-Mills field in the theo- ry put forward by Chen Ning Yang and Robert Mills. Yang-Mills theory is an extension of Maxwell theory that describes interactions in two other forces called the weak and strong nuclear forces. However, ground state fluctuations have a much more serious effect in a quantum theory of gravity.
Again, each wavelength would have a ground state energy. Since there is no limit to how short the wave- lengths of the Maxwell field can be, there are an infinite number of different wavelengths in any region of spacetime and an infinite amount of ground state energy. Because energy density is, like mat- ter, a source of gravity, this infinite energy density ought to mean there is enough gravitational attraction in the universe to curl spacetime into a single point, which obviously hasn't happened.
One might hope to solve the problem of this seeming contra- diction between observation and theory by saying that the ground state fluctuations have no gravitational effect, but this would not work. One can detect the energy of ground state fluctuations by the Casimir effect. If you place a pair of metal plates parallel to each other and close together, the effect of the plates is to reduce slight- ly the number of wavelengths that fit between the plates relative to the number outside.
This means that the energy density of ground state fluctuations between the plates, although still infinite, is less than the energy density outside by a finite amount Fig. This difference in energy density gives rise to a force pulling the plates together, and this force has been observed experimentally.
Forces are a source of gravity in general relativity, just as matter is, so it would not be consistent to ignore the gravitational effect of this energy difference. Reduced number of wavelengths that can fit between the plates The energy density of ground state The energy density of ground fluctuations between the plates is state fluctuations is greater less than the density outside, caus- outside the plates. If this constant had an infinite negative value, it could exactly cancel the infinite posi- tive value of the ground state energies in free space, but this cos- mological constant seems very ad hoc, and it would have to be tuned to extraordinary accuracy.
Fortunately, a totally new kind of symmetry was discovered in the s that provides a natural physical mechanism to cancel the infinities arising from ground state fluctuations.
Supersymmetry is a feature of our modern mathematical models that can be described in various ways. One way is to say that spacetime has extra dimensions besides the dimensions we experience. These are called Grassmann dimensions, because they are measured in numbers known as Grassmann variables rather than in ordinary real numbers.
Ordinary numbers commute; that is, it does not matter in which order you multiply them: 6 times 4 is the same as 4 times 6. But Grassmann variables anticommute: x times y is the same as —y times x.
Supersymmetry was first considered for removing infinities in matter fields and Yang-Mills fields in a spacetime where both the ordinary number dimensions and the Grassmann dimensions were flat, not curved. But it was natural to extend it to ordinary numbers and Grassmann dimensions that were curved.
This led to a number of theories called supergravity, with different amounts of supersym- metry. In doing so they briefly annihilate one another in a frantic burst of energy, creating a photon.
T h i s then releases its energy, producing another electron-positron pair. T h i s still appears as if they are just deflected into new trajectories. Then, when they collide and annihilate one another, they create a new string with a different vibrational pattern. Releasing energy, it divides into two strings continuing along new trajec- tories. Because there are equal numbers point in space, but one-dimensional of bosons and fermions, the biggest infinities cancel in supergravi- strings. These strings may have ends or they may join up with themselves in ty theories see Fig 2.
There remained the possibility that there might be smaller but Just like the strings on a violin, the still infinite quantities left over. No one had the patience needed to strings in string theory support cer- calculate whether these theories were actually completely finite. It tain vibrational patterns, or resonant frequencies, whose wavelengths fit was reckoned it would take a good student two hundred years, and precisely between the two ends.
But while the different resonant fre- Still, up to 1 9 8 5 , most people believed that most supersymmetric quencies of a violin's strings give rise to different musical notes, the different supergravity theories would be free of infinities. People declared there ferent masses and force charges, was no reason not to expect infinities in supergravity theories, and which are interpreted as fundamental this was taken to mean they were fatally flawed as theories.
Instead, particles. Roughly speaking, the short- er the wavelength of the oscillation on it was claimed that a theory named supersymmetric string theory the string, the greater the mass of the was the only way to combine gravity with quantum theory.
Strings, particle. They have only length. Strings in string theory move through a background spacetime. Ripples on the string are interpreted as particles Fig. If the strings have Grassmann dimensions as well as their ordi- nary number dimensions, the ripples will correspond to bosons and fermions. In this case, the positive and negative ground state ener- gies will cancel so exactly that there will be no infinities even of the smaller sort.
Historians of science in the future will find it interesting to chart the changing tide of opinion among theoretical physicists. For a few years, strings reigned supreme and supergravity was dis- missed as just an approximate theory, valid at low energy. If supergravity was only a low energy approximation, it could not claim to be the fundamental theory of the universe.
Instead, the underlying theory was supposed to be one of five possible super- string theories. But which of the five string theories described our universe? And how could string theory be formulated, beyond the approximation in which strings were pictured as surfaces with one space dimension and one time dimension moving through a flat background spacetime?
Wouldn't the strings curve the background spacetime? To start with, it was realized that strings are just one member of a wide class of objects that can be extended in more than one dimension.
Paul Townsend, who, like me, is a member of the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at Cambridge, and who did much of the fun- damental work on these objects, gave them the name "p-branes. Instead, we should adopt the principle of p-brane democ- racy: all p-branes are created equal.
All the p-branes could be found as solutions of the equations of supergravity theories in 10 or 11 dimensions. While 10 or 11 dimensions doesn't sound much like the spacetime we experience, the idea was that the other 6 or 7 dimensions are curled up so small that we don't notice them; we are only aware of the remaining 4 large and nearly flat dimensions.
Special cases are extra dimensions. We do not yet have any observations dimensional spacetime. Often, some or all of the p-dimensions are curled that require extra dimensions for their explanation.
However, there up like a torus. The membranes can be seen better if they string curled up curled up into a torus are curled up. The dualities suggest that the different string theories are just different expressions of the same underlying theory, which has been named M-theory.
But what has convinced many people, including myself, that one should take models with extra dimensions seriously is that there is a web of unexpected relationships, called dualities, between the models.
These dualities show that the models are all essentially equivalent; that is, they are just different aspects of the same under- lying theory, which has been given the name M-theory. Not to take Type IIB this web of dualities as a sign we are on the right track would be a bit like believing that God put fossils into the rocks in order to mis- Type I Type IIA lead Darwin about the evolution of life.
These dualities show that the five superstring theories all describe the same physics and that they are also physically equiva- lent to supergravity Fig. One cannot say that superstrings are more fundamental than supergravity, or vice versa. Rather, they are different expressions of the same underlying theory, each useful for calculations in different kinds of situations. Because string theo- Heterotic-0 Heterotic-E ries don't have any infinities, they are good for calculating what happens when a few high energy particles collide and scatter off each other.
However, they are not of much use for describing how M-theory unites the five string theories within a single theoretical the energy of a very large number of particles curves the universe or framework, but many of its prop- forms a bound state, like a black hole. For these situations, one erties have yet to be understood. It is this picture that I shall mainly use in what follows. The model has rules that determine the history in imaginary time in terms of the history in real time, and vice versa.
Imaginary time Imaginary numbers are a mathemati- cal construction. You can't have an sounds like something from science fiction, but it is a well-defined imaginary number credit card bill. One can think of ordinary real numbers such as 1 , 2 , - 3. Imaginary numbers can then be represented as corresponding to positions on a vertical line: zero is again in the middle, positive imaginary numbers plotted upward, and negative imaginary num- bers plotted downward.
Thus imaginary numbers can be thought of as a new kind of number at right angles to ordinary real numbers. Because they are a mathematical construct, they don't need a phys- ical realization; one can't have an imaginary number of oranges or an imaginary credit card bill Fig.
One might think this means that imaginary numbers are just a mathematical game having nothing to do with the real world. From the viewpoint of positivist philosophy, however, one cannot deter- mine what is real. All one can do is find which mathematical mod- els describe the universe we live in. It turns out that a mathematical model involving imaginary time predicts not only effects we have already observed but also effects we have not been able to measure yet nevertheless believe in for other reasons.
So what is real and what is imaginary? Is the distinction just in our minds? But the real time direction was distin- from the space directions because it guished from t h e three spatial directions; the world line or history increases only along the history of an of an observer always increased in t h e real time direction that is, observer unlike the space directions, which can increase or decrease along time always m o v e d from past to future , but it could increase or that history.
The imaginary time direc- decrease in any of t h e three spatial directions. In o t h e r words, one tion of quantum theory, on the other could reverse direction in space, but not in time Fig. On the o t h e r hand, because imaginary time is at right angles to real time, it behaves like a fourth spatial direction. As one moves north, the circles of latitude at constant distances from the South Pole become bigger corresponding to the universe expand- ing with imaginary time.
The universe would reach maximum size at the equator and then contract again with increasing imaginary time to a single point at the North Pole. Even though the universe would have zero size at the poles, these points would not be singularities, just as the North and South Poles on the Earth's surface are perfectly regular points.
This suggests s that the origin of the universe in imag- inary time can be a regular point in Imaginary time as degrees of latitude spacetime. Because all the lines of longitude meet at the North and South Poles, time is standing still at the poles; an increase of imaginary time leaves one on the same spot, just as going west on the North Pole of the Earth still leaves one on the North Pole.
It is in this imaginary sense that time has a shape. To see some of the possibilities, consider an imaginary time spacetime that is a sphere, like the surface of the Earth. Suppose that imaginary time was degrees of latitude Fig. T h e n the history of the universe in imaginary time would begin at the South Pole. It would make no sense to ask, " W h a t h a p p e n e d before the beginning? T h e South Pole is a perfectly regular point of the Earth's surface, and the same laws hold there as at other points.
T h i s suggests that the b e g i n n i n g of the universe in imaginary time can be a regular point of spacetime, and that the same laws can hold at the beginning as in the rest of the universe. T h e quantum origin and evolution of the universe will be discussed in the next chapter. A n o t h e r possible b e h a v i o r is illustrated by taking imaginary time to be degrees of longitude on the Earth.
All the lines of longi- tude meet at the N o r t h and S o u t h Poles Fig. T h i s is very similar to the way that ordinary time appears to stand still on the horizon of a b l a c k h o l e.
We have c o m e to r e c o g n i z e that this standing still of real and imaginary time either b o t h stand still or neither does means that the s p a c e t i m e has a temperature, as I discovered for black holes. N o t o n l y does a b l a c k h o l e have a t e m - perature, it also behaves as if it has a quantity called entropy. T h e entropy is a measure of t h e n u m b e r of internal states ways it c o u l d be configured on the inside that the black h o l e c o u l d have w i t h o u t looking any different to an outside observer, w h o can o n l y observe its mass, rotation, and c h a r g e.
Information a b o u t the quantum states in a region of spacetime may be s o m e h o w c o d e d on t h e boundary of the region, which has t w o dimensions less. T h i s is like t h e way that a hologram carries a t h r e e - d i m e n s i o n a l image on a two-dimensional surface. T h i s is essential if we are to be able to predict the radiation that c o m e s out of black holes.
If we can't do that, we won't be able to predict the future as fully as we t h o u g h t. It seems we may live on a 3 - b r a n e — a four-dimensional three space plus o n e time surface that is the b o u n d a r y of a five-dimensional region, with the remaining dimen- sions curled up very small. T h e state of the world on a brane e n c o d e s what is h a p p e n i n g in the five-dimensional region.
Is the universe actually infinite or just very large? And is it everlasting or just long-lived? Isn't it presumptuous of us even to make the attempt? Despite this cautionary tale, I believe we can and should try to Above: Prometheus. Etruscan vase understand the universe.
We have already made remarkable progress painting, 6th century B. We don't yet have a c o m p l e t e picture, but this may not be far off. Left: Hubble space telescope lens and mirrors being upgraded by a T h e most obvious t h i n g about space is that it g o e s on and on space shuttle mission.
Australia can and on. T h i s has been c o n f i r m e d by modern instruments such as the be seen below. W h a t we see are billions and billions of galaxies of various shapes and sizes see page 7 0 , Fig. Galaxies can have various shapes and sizes; they can be either elliptical or spiral, like our own Milky Way. The dust in the spiral arms blocks our view of the universe in FIG. T h e stellar dust in the spi- of distant galaxies Fig.
We find that the galaxies are distributed ral arms blocks our view within the roughly uniformly throughout space, with some local concentra- plane of the galaxy but we have a tions and voids. The density of galaxies appears to drop off at very clear view on either side of that plane. As far as we can tell, the universe goes on in space forever see page 7 2 , Fig. Although the universe seems to be much the same at each position in space, it is definitely changing in time.
This was not realized until the early years of the twentieth century. Up to then, it was thought the universe was essentially constant in time.
It might have existed for an infinite time, but that seemed to lead to absurd conclusions. If stars had been radiating for an infinite time, they would have heated up the universe to their temperature. T h e observation that we have all made, that the sky at night is dark, is very important.
It implies that the universe c a n n o t have existed forever in the state we see today. S o m e t h i n g must have hap- p e n e d in the past to make the stars light up a finite time ago, which means that t h e light from very distant stars has not had time to reach us yet.
T h i s would explain why the sky at night isn't glowing in every d i r e c t i o n. W h a t was t h e c l o c k that If the universe was static and infinite in every direction, every line of sight told them it was time to shine? As we've seen, this puzzled t h o s e would end in a star which would make philosophers, much like Immanuel K a n t , w h o b e l i e v e d that the uni- the night sky as bright as the sun.
However, discrepancies with this idea b e g a n to appear with the observations by V e s t o S l i p h e r and Edwin H u b b l e in t h e s e c o n d decade o f the twentieth century. In T h e Doppler effect is also true of light waves. If a galaxy were to remain at a order for them to appear so small and faint, the distances had to be constant distance from Earth, charac- so great that light from them would have taken millions or even bil- teristic lines in the spectrum would lions of years to reach us.
This indicated that the beginning of the appear in a normal or standard posi- tion. However, if the galaxy is moving universe couldn't have been just a few thousand years ago. Astronomers had learned that by analyzing the light acteristic lines will be shifted toward the red right.
If the galaxy is moving from other galaxies, it was possible to measure whether they are toward us then the waves will appear moving toward us or away from us Fig. To their great surprise, to be compressed, and the lines will they had found that nearly all galaxies are moving away. Moreover, be blue-shifted left. The universe is expanding Fig. The discovery of the expansion of the universe was one of the great intellectual revolutions of the twentieth century.
It came as a total surprise, and it completely changed the discussion of the origin of the universe. If the galaxies are moving apart, they must have been closer together in the past. From the present rate of expansion, we can estimate that they must have been very close together indeed ten to fifteen billion years ago. As described in the last chapter, Roger Penrose and I were able to show that Einstein's general theory of rel- ativity implied that the universe and time itself must have had a beginning in a tremendous explosion.
We are used to the idea that events are caused by earlier events, w h i c h in turn are caused by still earlier events. W h a t caused it? Need to learn statistics as part of your job, or want some help passing a statistics course? Statistics in a Nutshell is a clear and concise introduction and reference that's perfect for anyone with no previous background in the subject. This book gives you a solid understanding of statistics without being too simple, yet without the numbing complexity of most college texts.
You get a firm grasp of the fundamentals and a hands-on understanding of how to apply them before moving on to the more advanced material that follows. Each chapter presents you with easy-to-follow descriptions illustrated by graphics, formulas, and plenty of solved examples.
Before you know it, you'll learn to apply statistical reasoning and statistical techniques, from basic concepts of probability and hypothesis testing to multivariate analysis. Organized into four distinct sections, Statistics in a Nutshell offers you:Introductory material: Different ways to think about statistics Basic concepts of measurement and probability theoryData management for statistical analysis Research design and experimental design How to critique statistics presented by others Basic inferential statistics: Basic concepts of inferential statistics The concept of correlation, when it is and is not an appropriate measure of association Dichotomous and categorical data The distinction between parametric and nonparametric statistics Advanced inferential techniques: The General Linear Model Analysis of Variance ANOVA and MANOVA Multiple linear regression Specialized techniques: Business and quality improvement statistics Medical and public health statistics Educational and psychological statistics Unlike many introductory books on the subject, Statistics in a Nutshell doesn't omit important material in an effort to dumb it down.
And this book is far more practical than most college texts, which tend to over-emphasize calculation without teaching you when and how to apply different statistical tests. With Statistics in a Nutshell, you learn how to perform most common statistical analyses, and understand statistical techniques presented in research articles.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF. Skip to main content. This service is more advanced with JavaScript available. Advertisement Hide. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves. This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access. Google Scholar. Barnard Feeney, A. CrossRef Google Scholar. Bloor, S.
Product Data Exchange. Publisher: CRC, November 30, Fowler, J. Hardwick, M. ISO Industrial automation systems and integration — Product data representation and exchange — Part Implementation methods: Clear text encoding of the exchange structure, Geneva, Switzerland: International Organisation for Standardisation ISO.
0コメント